Return to David's theory of evolution and theodicy (Evolution)

by David Turell @, Monday, September 11, 2023, 18:28 (229 days ago) @ dhw

DAVID: You attack Raup's statistical results…

dhw:They are irrelevant to the question why, according to your theory, a God whose one and only purpose was to produce us plus food “had to” produce 99.9 out of 100 species that had no connection with us plus food.***

They are relevant as they quantify the loss that must happen in an evolutionary culling process.


DAVID: ….and reach an irrational premise about God's use of evolution because He had the obvious purpose of producing humans. Adler's argument is no natural process could have done it. Your attempt at theism is unrecognizable.

dhw: The ID argument is that no “natural” process could have produced the complexities of all species. The irrational premise is the theory bolded above***. You admit that you have no idea why your God would have used such a method to achieve such a purpose. I suggest that an irrational theory that makes no sense to the theorist himself is probably wrong.

God does not talk with me. His reasons are unknown, but His goal is obvious.


DAVID: I've explained 99.9% loss is a required result in the evolutionary process. You make a mockery of a statistical result from a method God chose to use. You have agreed in the past God had that right.

dhw: I agree that the vast majority of species have been lost, and you agree that they were irrelevant to what you believe was your God’s purpose. As first cause, your all-powerful God therefore invented a system which forced him to design 99.9 out of 100 species that had no connection with his one and only purpose. One moment he “had to”, the next moment he “chose to”. Your self-contradiction is yet more evidence that, as you admit, your theory makes no sense even to you.

I'm sorry it makes no sense to you. I accept how God did it. God knew exactly what to do.


DAVID: You found the problem, finally. God is selfless so when we think He enjoys, etc., it must be in an allegorical sense as Adler advises.

dhw: Stop messing about with language. If “selfless” means “selfless”, “enjoy” means “enjoy”. YOU know what you mean by both terms, and so you are sure that your God takes pleasure in creating and watching his creations. How can he do so without a “self”? Why do you use words if you don’t think they mean what they mean to you?

I understand how I use words about God allegorically, as taught by Adler. I wish you did.


Evolution and theodicy

DAVID: My views of God are mine alone.

dhw: Then stop pretending that theists agree with your explanation!

My views of theodicy are theists published views. Stop mixing two subjects!!

From here: Friday, September 01, 2023, 18:27

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgzGtwqQdpjfGvpFVPlsHHvXCGNWT

"Revealing whales’ secrets to long, cancer-free lives"

"Note the bold. Cancers are the result of mistakes as cell split in mitosis, a very complicated process with many events occurring all at once, under tight controls. Our bodies cells do this trillions of times a day, which means cancer is actually a very rare outcome. This should be noted in the theodicy thread for dhw's edification."

You didn't reply.


DAVID: […] Holocaust from evil free-willed Hitler. (A side effect!)

dhw: I’m surprised you hadn’t realized that “millions” suffer. According to you, your all-knowing God went ahead deliberately creating a system he knew would result in the free-willed Hitler & Co slaughtering 6 million Jews. I’m not arguing against free will. I’m asking why/how an all-good God could knowingly create a system that would lead to such horrific evil.

DAVID: I accept He did.

dhw: Your acceptance does not answer the question how you can reconcile your God’s advance awareness that his invention of free will would result in Hitler & Co slaughtering 6 million Jews, with the theory that he is all-good? If your all-powerful, all-knowing God is the first cause of everything that has ever existed, where did evil come from?

DAVID: Simple answer repeated: evil is a side effect of God's good works.

Answered under “Microbiome (Back to theodicy)”.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum