Return to David's theory of evolution PARTS 1 & 2 (Evolution)

by David Turell @, Monday, March 21, 2022, 14:37 (767 days ago) @ dhw

DAVID: The only view of God it is logical to have is humans were God's purpose

dhw" And yet you cannot understand why he chose to design all those life forms and foods that had no connection with humans. You even go so far as to tell us “God makes sense only to himself. He has reasons we may not understand.” How wonderful to know that the only logical view is one which doesn’t make sense to us humans!

Same distortion: I don't need to know why God chose to evolve us. Only you do.


DAVID (from the “brain” thread:) We are a purposeful creation, with God not doing it for His own emotional needs.

dhw: I keep repeating that I do not regard God as being “needy”. I am happy with your agreement that he enjoys creating, and therefore by extension it is possible that he creates because he wants to do something he enjoys.

Stop distorting! God does not need to create to produce enjoyment! Vastly different from your statement.


DAVID: He gave us the mental capacity to recognize His existence. There is no way to know if He wished accolades or thanks. Religions do that hopefully: maybe He'll do more for us, make our lives easier, support us, etc. As for God inventing life, it was just a part of the necessary course for God to follow.

dhw: There is no way we can “know” anything about him, if he exists, and that is why you and I make our “humanizing” guesses, some of which even coincide. I have no idea what you mean by your last sentence. If God exists, then of course he invented life. What was “necessary” about it? He would have done whatever he wanted to do.

Simple explanation explained many times: God evolves all steps from Big Bang to humans. His method of choice.

DAVID:Bold all you want. God knows what He is doing. He produced us with His purpose.

dhw: Of course he knows what he is doing. And whatever may have been his purpose and his method, it has resulted in his having produced – whether directly or indirectly - humans, dinosaurs, dodos, the duckbilled platypus and every other life form and food that ever existed. How does that come to mean that every other life form and food was "preparation" for us, although most had no connection with us other than the fact that they were all "biochemical"?

Yes, biochemical. Necessary simple biochemical processes were designed first, which underlies all phenotypical changes later.


DAVID: It is obvious God's actions makes no sense to you, as Adler and I see them. I'm not hiding behind Adler as you pose. I read authorities on how to think about God.

dhw: I’m amazed to hear that anyone has the “authority” on how to think about God, and I would be equally amazed to hear that these “authorities” claimed that God’s one and only purpose was to design humans plus food, and therefore he designed countless life forms and foods that had no connection with humans plus food, and God makes sense only to himself and if we want a logical explanation for this theory, we shall have to ask God himself.

Did you ever study theistic views of God which show you how to view God for yourselF


Transferred from “Cellular intelligence”:

dhw: You asked what kind of non-war life I imagined, and I have answered. Apart from the few carnivorous species, plants draw their nutrients from inanimate food. They may struggle to survive, but they do not hunt and kill, and I doubt if you would describe a herd of cows munching grass as part of a constant war to survive by eating. According to you, your God specially designed all species, and so he specially designed a constant war. Once more, please tell us why you think he chose to do so.

DAVID: We are animals, evolved from previous animals. Plants appeared long after animals were present. The animals had to attack each other to eat and live. […] Conclusion: war is unavoidable and God chose the correct way to evolve us.

dhw: You’re simply describing the system which resulted in the war. I’m not disputing that! I’m asking you why you think your God chose to design such a system. According to you, his only purpose was to design humans plus our food. Why, then, did he design all these different life forms in such a way that they all had to eat and kill one another, including those that eat and kill us or are eaten and killed by us? Why in your eyes is “war” correct, and do you believe your all-powerful God was incapable of designing a peaceful “garden of Eden”?

I haven't tried to conceive of a different peaceful form of life. Is it even possible? You raised the issue, so let's have your version.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum