Return to David's theory of evolution PART 2 (Evolution)

by David Turell , Friday, June 17, 2022, 16:59 (678 days ago) @ dhw

Human membrane pore

dhw: If one part doesn’t work, the mechanism won’t work. Fits in perfectly with the concept of intelligent cells cooperating to create a mechanism that works. However, see above for mechanisms that do work but can be improved.

DAVID: So simple cell committees understand design for future use?

dhw: Why do you keep repeating this nonsense and making me repeat: CELLS DO NOT UNDERSTAND DESIGN FOR FUTURE USE! They respond to present requirements or opportunities. Once the response works, then of course it will be used in the future. The immune system provides a perfect example of the process!

I repeat because you will not recognize the gaps in the fossil record. You always wish for missing fossils to fill your multiple generations theory.

Ediacaran-Cambrian transition: 410,000 years

dhw: Of course they are all theoretical guesses. Does it not occur to you that the existence of God and his 3.8-billion-year programme or individual dabbles for all evolutionary changes are also “theoretical guesses”? Now please tell me why the 410,000-year transition invalidates all the “theoretical guesses” that explain the absence of fossils.

DAVID: See Egnor's previous comments which you well know. If after decades of searching for more, and do not appear, there are no more.

dhw: Yet again: there are logical reasons why there may be no more fossils! But for some obscure reason, you think that a list of reasons published in 2019 is out of date!

The list of reasons is not FACT, not proof, but reasonable guesses as to why they are absent. They can be all wrong also.

dhw: We don’t know any of the “origins”, including that of life itself. However, you suggested that sex may have originated before the Cambrian. And we've been told that fundamental elements of the brain and nervous system existed much earlier than the Cambrian. This suggests the continuity of evolution (which you favour for the sake of a continuous line between bacteria and humans), as opposed to separate creation without precursors (which you favour as evidence for your God’s existence).

No direct response from you.

No reason for me to respond since you summarized the issue. But since you insist: the underlying biochemistry must precede all form advances. And early new forms will prepare for later new form. Evolution!!!

How did sex pop up?

DAVID: It required chromatin to appear so sex chromosomes could exist:

QUOTE: “'Our results underscore that the structural and regulatory roles of chromatin are as old as eukaryotes themselves,” Dr. Grau-Bové said.

DAVID: as Darwinist scientists they have their guesses as to how chromatin appeared. It could be a virus attack or a designing God. At any rate we came from Archaea. And to have sexual reproduction major modifications in DNA structure had to happen. Sex allowed for multiple possible complex new variations to appear, while simple binary fission couldn't do that. Design or chance, I chose design.

dhw: Since chromatin is so vital for sex, we have yet another example of fundamental elements being present long before the arrival of the fully developed system. More evidence in favour of the continuity of common descent as opposed to organs and species suddenly appearing without any predecessors.

Thank you for clearly supporting my biochemcial theory of evolution. With that bazis, new forms can appear. Chromatin came as new biochemistry,