David's theory of evolution: God's error corrections II (Evolution)

by David Turell @, Saturday, November 14, 2020, 20:57 (15 days ago) @ dhw

DAVID: God created the fine=tuned universe to allow life. Then He guided the giant Milky Way formation to allow the Earth-friendly planet to form, which had many necessary attributes, in a safe areas of the galaxy; with all that in place He created life with Archaea bacteria. He then evolved Humans with a giant food bush to nourish them. All important interim goals on the way to His final goal of having us most unusual and unexpected form to ever appear (Adler).

dhw: Another of your dodges. If God exists, I am not disputing the logic behind your theory that he created all the conditions necessary for life. Our dispute begins at life itself, with the illogicality of your theory that he directly designed every extinct life form, econiche, natural wonder etc. “as part of the goal of evolving [= directly designing] humans” although 99% of them had no connection with humans. Please stop dodging!

Why do you dodge the point that God chose to evolve us as His method of creation? Your weird objection to my approach is that you fault God for spending all that time evolving us. That is my belief which your illogical rejection will never shake!!!


DAVID: I know what history tells me. I don't have to know why He decided to do it this way. All of your complaints are simply criticisms of God's choices of action as I view it.

dhw: They are criticisms of your view of God’s actions, because it makes no sense for your God to have directly designed vast numbers of life forms and econiches and food supplies and natural wonders with no connection to humans if his goal was to directly design humans.

His goal was not to directly design humans. That is your constant unreasonable misinterpretation of my belief. That was his ultimate goal!!!


DAVID: I asked you a long time ago if you wanted direct creation as a result of your complaints about God. That is the conclusion anyone who believes would think. Your demolition exists only in your illogical approach to the concept of a non-human God.

dhw: I am not complaining about your God but about your interpretation of his purpose and method of achieving that purpose, and I am not proposing direct creation at all – the very opposite. I criticize your theory because it is illogical. You acknowledge the logic of my theory – theistic version: God invented cellular intelligence to allow organisms to design their own modes of survival in response to changing conditions – but you criticize it because it “humanizes” your God, although you agree that he probably has thought patterns, emotions and other attributes similar to our own!

Can't I convince you my belief will remain logical to me, even if you constantly reject it is your own mixed up thoughts about God. Your concept of god has never matched mine.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum