A Sense of Free Will: requires a properly functioning brain (Introduction)

by romansh ⌂ @, Wednesday, August 12, 2015, 14:13 (3391 days ago) @ David Turell

"A recent study found that explaining naive realism to people and showing them visual illusions reduced their certainty in their judgments of others' behavior — 
Are you claiming the study did not find this link or that it is simply a misinterpretation.-> Maybe neuroscience education can help alleviate social strife. (Who knows how many wars the dress-color controversy has averted by highlighting the subjectivity of experience — not counting the ones it's sparked online?)-You doubt explanations of our behaviours might alleviate social strife?-
> One might start by explaining how the self is fabricated and that it is a fabrication, just like everything else we experience. “The man who wasn't there” is an evocative term for a particular pathological self-negation. But, according to neuroscience, none of us are here."-There are two senses of the word fabricated here ... using the sense "made" it makes perfect sense to me? Having said that even in the sense of "made up" it is valid. 
 
>> The author described pathological brain states and concluded the above. I don't think a normal brain can be thought of this way. As I've noted the normal brain provides for a conscious state and a sense of self. That it provides patterns for us from all its neurons in ionized states is helpful. If you reflect upon what you see, it is obvious that the arrangement is very helpful.-I don't recall the author saying anything else, other than when we don't have a 'normal' brain state then we don't have a 'normal' sense of free will or of self. Now the way the article was written I suspect the author(s) don't believe in contra-causal free will and probably believe in the illusory nature of the self.-These two beliefs are understandable if we apply a little bit of inductive logic and careful self awareness.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum