dhw: big brain evolution:comparing chimp and brain organoids (Evolution)

by David Turell @, Wednesday, April 17, 2019, 18:10 (219 days ago) @ dhw

DAVID: My point above is quite clear. We both state God is in charge of evolution, as you assume a theistic position. My suggested ways God might have exerted control are obvious possibilities. Since God has purposes in His methods, I strongly doubt He allows free expression by organisms as they evolve.

dhw: As usual, you try to separate purpose and method. Apart from vague references to plural goals, you have always insisted that the whole of evolution was preprogrammed or dabbled for the sole purpose of producing the brain of H. sapiens. Now you say you don’t actually believe that every bacterial action, evolutionary innovation, econiche, lifestyle and natural wonder was preprogrammed or dabbled (your nebulous “guidelines” come under the same umbrella). Thank you. What alternatives are there besides “free expression”? And what makes you think that there cannot be a purpose behind “free expression”?

Weird comment. What don't you understand about the meaning of 'free'? If organisms have the free ability to evolve whatever they want, why knows what might have developed and how could have any purposeful result? Evolution with purpose means evolving toward a living goal of a specific organism.


DAVID: If you admit God was in charge of evolution, why can't He have freedom of choice? You make no sense.

dhw: Of course he has freedom of choice! My complaint is that you keep insisting that he chose what you want him to choose (specially designing 3.5+ billion years of non-human life forms to eat or not eat each other before he specially designed the only thing he wanted to design: H. sapiens). There are several alternatives to this incomprehensible one (you have “no idea” why he would have chosen it), but now you try to dismiss them on the grounds that your God was free to choose your version!

I can only interpret the history. I've simply described it and attributed it to God's right to choose a method of development/creation.


DAVID: All of your suppositions about God imply limits, indecision or incompetence, or your own self-imposed impatience wondering why He waited so long. I fully understand He has the right to choose His method and you've agreed. I'm sure you can follow this logic.

dhw: At one moment you say I insist on God’s omnipotence, and the next that I insist on his limitations! My different hypotheses embrace ALL the different possibilities, and you accept that they all provide logical explanations of life’s history, in contrast to your own.

DAVID: The difference is I've made decisions and you can't or won't.

dhw: You have decided to stick to your own hypothesis and reject the others, despite your agreement that at least one vital portion of it (the preprogramming and dabbling method of achieving your interpretation of your God’s purpose) is not strong enough to constitute a belief! Your decision, once we accept the God hypothesis, is that his sole purpose was to produce H. sapiens, except that it might not have been his sole purpose, he may have preprogrammed or dabbled the whole of evolution, but you don’t actually believe that, and he chose to spend 3.5+ billion years specially designing anything but the one thing he wanted to specially design and you have no idea why.

Again you repeat your whole illogical complaint. You keep implying God should have instantly created humans, but that isn't what actually happened. Assuming God was in charge, and you do for discussion purposes, it is patently obvious He chose to evolve humans over lots of time.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum