Biological complexity: how we smell odors (Introduction)

by David Turell , Saturday, May 28, 2016, 21:42 (3101 days ago) @ dhw


> dhw: A remarkable twist. From having your God maintaining control and carefully planning every innovation and natural wonder, either preprogramming or organizing them all personally, you have suddenly switched to him allowing organisms to do their own thing (yippee for autonomy!) and leaving it to chance whether their purposeless complexifications will actually work (other than when he dabbles).-I'm just testing out an extension of my original concept from my first book, a drive to complexity. Direct programming or dabbling still remains an issue, which of course, cannot be resolved. But a free complexity mechanism sure explains the weird bush of adaptations.-> 
> Theistic teleology? If your God designed the autonomous mechanism, I'd suggest he wanted to see what it would come up with (apart from when he dabbled - which leaves scope for special favourites like us humans). Then the only difference between our versions is that your God made organisms seek to complexify for the sake of complexifying, whereas mine made them seek to survive and/or improve. ..... we still have the same autonomous mechanism producing the same results, yours still by Darwinian luck, mine still by cellular intelligence -As I have previously explained what appears to be cellular intelligence are purposeful-acting molecular reactions appearing as a neural network look-alike, supported by my recent entry. (Friday, May 27, 2016, 19:12)