Miscellany (General)

by David Turell @, Sunday, May 16, 2021, 15:57 (153 days ago) @ dhw

BATS
DAVID: I use continuity: God created life and controlled evolution. Theorizing separately can avoid God, your preferred approach.

dhw: I also use continuity: past evolution was a continuous process of life branching out into different life forms, 99% of which had no connection with humans. And I have offered you a variety of theories that include your God (e.g. experimenting, having new ideas etc.). “Controlled evolution” is one of your fixed beliefs, whereas I offer one theory which has him creating a free-for-all. Please stop pretending that my theistic alternatives avoid God.

Your invented form of God does not describe the God I believe in. Belief vs. theoery

DAVID: Inventing an inventive mechanism to do the designing is second-hand, cumbersome and very unlikely as a solution, used by a logical form of God.

dhw: Do you regard your free will as second-hand (whatever that means) and cumbersome?

What a weird comparison!! My free will has nothing to do with God's evolutionary designs.


New forms require new genes
dhw: […] you haven’t explained why he would have specially designed all the Cambrian forms that went extinct after the “Explosion” […]

DAVID: The Cambrian forms, as the first complex animals are our ancestors. 99% extinction is a reasonable part of the process, but you continue an illogical, unreasonable complaint.

dhw: Have you really traced a line from ALL the Cambrian life forms to us? Amazing! What “process”? How can it be logical and reasonable for your God to specially design the 99% of life forms that had no connection with humans or their food supply, as part of the “process” of designing the only life form he wanted to design, which was humans (plus food supply)?

Remember you have said God, as creator, produced evolution.


The obstetric dilemma

DAVID: God speciates. The change to the pelvic outlet and the bigger brain could be simultaneous in appearance of a new species under His design. You are the only one assuming 'over time' for adaptations to correct problems.

dhw: I had no idea that I was all alone in the world with my belief that effect follows cause, solutions are responses to problems, and this automatically entails a time sequence. Even you agreed that “instant solutions” don’t happen, and now you’re telling us that problems and solutions are instant!

There are when God speciates.


Using gestures
DAVID: All humans can communicate this way:

QUOTE: "When people don’t share a language, they quickly resort to using their hands, rather than their voices. […] “If gesture is good enough for language,” says Aleksandra Ćwiek, a linguistics Ph.D. student at the Leibniz-Centre General Linguistics, “why the hell do we talk?”

dhw: Like all our fellow organisms, we use every means at our disposal to communicate. I suggest that we humans talk because we have a helluva lot to communicate, and so although other animals also use their voices, we have developed an almost infinitely greater variety of sounds because we have an almost infinitely greater number of things to communicate. And that is why gestures are not enough, and grunts and roars and howls and chatter have evolved into human language.
I am now applying for a grant to further my research into why all life forms communicate by using their means of communication. I know you will support me.

All due to our God-given brain, which must be studied in your grant


Subterranean extremophiles
QUOTES: "humans need 21 per cent oxygen in our atmosphere to be able to breathe. Nematodes can make do indefinitely with only 0.5 per cent oxygen, and many species can survive extended periods with less or no oxygen at all. (DAVID’S bold)

"[…] over a long period of time some organisms might have adapted to even more extreme conditions deeper in the subsurface..."

DAVID: Note my bold. Oxygen is only needed by complex life forms. Living forms can be anywhere.

dhw: I don’t know why you bolded this. “Living forms can be anywhere” suggests to me one mighty free-for-all, as cells and cell communities of all kinds adapt themselves to all kinds of conditions in their efforts to survive. How all of them could be “part of the goal of evolving [= specially designing] humans” is quite beyond me.

The whole concept of evolution as a necessary continuum is way beyond you.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum