Evolution: more genomic evidence of pre-planning Part One (Evolution)

by dhw, Thursday, April 29, 2021, 08:30 (1065 days ago) @ David Turell

DAVID: They were always excessive for final future use, no matter how you contort the descriptions.

dhw: A factory may need 100 workers until a new, more efficient process is developed, and then some workers will be made redundant. It is absurd to say that the redundant ones were always excessive for final future use. And so let me yet again explain my theory: the new cells were NECESSARY to meet a new requirement. They continued to be necessary to fulfil that requirement, would probably have continued to complexify on a small scale during the period of stasis, but when major new requirements arose and the brain did not/could not expand any more, complexification took over and was so efficient that some cells were no longer necessary. What are the contortions?

DAVID: The brain is not a factory with fixed machines. The brain was given innate plasticity so the excess cells could be jettisoned when those cells finally needed were reorganized into the best efficiency.

An exact parallel to the plasticity of staffing: when a more efficient method is developed, excess staff are made redundant. Neither the original staff nor the original cells were excessive until a more efficient method took over from the original method.

DAVID: I agree past brains operated much like ours, but God gave us each step in bigger more complex brains. Brains did not grow themselves.

dhw: If they operated much like ours, then they operated autonomously. Or are you now saying that your God pops in to complexify our brains (and expand the hippocampus) before we can think up our new ideas? In other words, if he exists, your God would have given earlier brains the same mechanism for autonomous complexification and expansion that we have now. I propose that the mechanism is cellular intelligence.

DAVID: And I believe God speciates.

That is not an answer. You agree that the modern brain complexifies and in one case (hippocampus) expands autonomously, and past brains would have operated in the same way. Therefore (theistic version) your God’s role would have been to design the mechanism that gave all brains their autonomy. What method can you conceive of, other than cellular intelligence?

DAVID (taken from “Miscellany”): It is a mechanism coded into our DNA under God's control. As a result our cells look and act intelligently following God's implanted information.”

You have agreed that our brains complexify and expand autonomously. “Autonomy” does not mean “under God’s control”. “Coded into our DNA” and “implanted information” must therefore refer to the means whereby your God gave our brains that autonomy. In our next exchange, you even tell us that the neurons made the decision to jettison excess cells. God’s didn’t instruct them to do it. The cells did it. The point you make is irrelevant to the argument about “excess”, but in the context of intelligence, how else could cells take such decisions autonomously if they were not intelligent?

DAVID: There can be no denying extra neurons were always present, and my interpretation grants they might have had some light use while they remained, but the excess neurons allowed us to remodel our brains to fit the heavy uses we learned to employ, language, abstract ideas, mathematics with invented number systems, etc.

dhw: They were not “excess” (= unnecessary) if they enabled us to remodel our brains! They only became “excess” when remodelling in the form of enhanced complexification was able to cope with all the new requirements with such efficiency that they were no longer needed.

DAVID: How do you know the excess cells played a role in deciding to discard themselves? I would think the remaining reorganized neurons did the job.

I have not said which cells made the decision! I have only said that some cells were not needed when enhanced complexification coped with all the new requirements. Only then did they become “excess”, whereas you keep telling us they were “excess” right from the start.

DAVID: So heavily used brains are now 150 cc smaller. Making extras cells slightly useful in the beginning and then discarding them after complexification makes them an excess group of cells, used and then discarded.

dhw: Yet again: they were not “slightly useful” in the beginning. They were essential. If they hadn’t been essential, they would not have been added in the first place. And they would have continued to fulfil the same essential function until, as you rightly put it, complexification made them unnecessary or “excessive” to our needs. I make that four times in one post. Five times tomorrow? :-|

DAVID: If you would accept God's role the repeats are unnecessary. We will continue to interpret the known facts from different viewpoints. :-)

If you would accept your own agreement that past brains would have functioned in the same way as modern brains, by way of autonomous complexification and expansion, and your God would not have lumbered brains with unnecessary cells, and therefore his role would have been to design the mechanism that gave autonomy to the brain, I would not have to keep knocking down the straw men you keep erecting in order to justify your interpretation of God’s role in evolution. :-)


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum