Evolution: origin of eukaryotes:Archaea DNA similar to human (Evolution)

by David Turell , Thursday, September 19, 2019, 20:55 (1890 days ago) @ David Turell

A new study compares Archaea DNA to eukaryote DNA in humans:

https://phys.org/news/2019-09-key-similarities-human-archaea-chromosomes.html

"The similar clustering of DNA in humans and archaeal chromosomes is significant because certain genes activate or deactivate based upon how they're folded.

"'The inaccurate bundling, or 'folding,' of DNA can lead to the wrong gene being switched on or off," Bell said. "Studies have shown that switching the wrong genes on or off during cellular growth in humans can lead to changes in gene expression that can ultimately be carcinogenic."

"Archaea are simple single-celled organisms that comprise one of the three domains of life on Earth. Although found in every type of environment, including the human body, archaea are poorly understood compared to the other two domains: bacteria and eukaryotes, which include mammals such as humans. They're also more similar to eukaryotes on the genetic level than bacteria.

"The IU study is the first to visualize the organization of DNA in archaeal chromosomes. The key similarity is the way in which the DNA is arranged into clusters—or "discrete compartmentalizations"—based upon their function.

"'When we first saw the interaction patterns of the archaea's DNA, we were shocked," Bell said. "It looked just like what has been seen with human DNA."

"The study is also the first to describe the protein used to assemble archaeal DNA during cellular growth. The researchers dubbed this large protein complex as "coalescin" due to its similarities to a protein in eukaryotes called "condensin."

The advantages to the use of archaea as a model for studying the organization of DNA during cellular growth in humans—and the relationship between that organization and the activation of genes that may trigger cancers—is their relative simplicity.

"'Human cells are horrifyingly complex, and understanding the rules that govern DNA folding is extremely challenging," Bell said. "The simplicity of archaea means that they've got the potential to be a terrific model to help understand the fundamentally related—but much more complicated—cellular processes in humans.'"

Comment: It was previously found that eukaryotes were more closely related to Archaea. Does that make bacteria a side branch?