Different in degree or kind: An essay captures Adler (Introduction)

by David Turell @, Saturday, November 21, 2015, 05:50 (3291 days ago) @ romansh

David Really? they don't say much, and those thoughts are still immaterial. See below:
> romansh: Yes really ... and I don't need to say much.
> No thoughts are not immaterial.-By what definition are they not immaterial. Can you touch a thought?-> Romansh: Actually there is a bit more fidelity than "regions". What we have learned is that blood flow patterns can be a crude proxy for the brain function that humans describe as consciousness (at least the visual). -What fidelity more than regions? Yes, a very crude proxy. 
> 
> Romansh: So what evidence would persuade that consciousness is material?-Please tell me.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum