Sidebar
Latest postings
- Absence
13 hours, 9 minutes ago - More miscellany Parts One & Two
13 hours, 18 minutes ago - Return to David's theory of evolution, theodicy and purposes
13 hours, 27 minutes ago - Absence
19 hours, 0 minutes ago - More miscellany Parts One & Two
1 day, 0 hours, 34 min. ago - Return to David's theory of evolution, theodicy and purposes
1 day, 0 hours, 45 min. ago - Theoretical origin of life: making cell walls with lipids
1 day, 1 hours, 24 min. ago - More miscellany Parts One & Two
1 day, 13 hours, 5 min. ago - Return to David's theory of evolution, theodicy and purposes
1 day, 13 hours, 18 min. ago - Genome complexity: spliceosome architecture
1 day, 21 hours, 58 min. ago - More miscellany Parts One & Two
1 day, 22 hours, 49 min. ago - Return to David's theory of evolution, theodicy and purposes
2 days ago - Privileged planet: molybdenum and nitrogen fixing
2 days ago - More miscellany Parts One & Two
2 days ago - Return to David's theory of evolution, theodicy and purposes
2 days ago
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - xeno6696, 2010-02-23, 22:01 (Origins)
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - David Turell, 2010-02-23, 23:03
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 00:26
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - David Turell, 2010-02-24, 01:36
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 15:06
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - David Turell, 2010-02-24, 01:36
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - David Turell, 2010-03-07, 00:51
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - xeno6696, 2010-03-07, 22:03
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - xeno6696, 2010-03-07, 22:25
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - David Turell, 2010-03-07, 22:31
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 00:26
- Refutation of a Statistical Argument Supporting Coevolution - David Turell, 2010-02-23, 23:03
- Method for rapid evolution - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 21:43 (Introduction)
- Method for rapid evolution - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 00:28
- Method for rapid evolution - David Turell, 2010-04-02, 15:04
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-02-17, 22:00 (Agnosticism)
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-18, 23:02
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - Tim, 2010-07-04, 00:04
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-07-04, 14:24
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-07-04, 15:07
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-07-06, 16:58
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-07-08, 21:24
- Gradualism in Evolution (was Categories ...) - George Jelliss, 2010-07-10, 12:24
- Gradualism in Evolution (was Categories ...) - dhw, 2010-07-19, 08:52
- Gradualism in Evolution (was Categories ...) - George Jelliss, 2010-07-22, 00:24
- Gradualism in Evolution (was Categories ...) - David Turell, 2010-07-22, 15:59
- Gradualism in Evolution (was Categories ...) - dhw, 2010-07-22, 17:15
- Gradualism in Evolution (was Categories ...) - David Turell, 2010-07-23, 14:15
- Gradualism in Evolution (was Categories ...) - George Jelliss, 2010-07-23, 20:26
- Gradualism in Evolution (was Categories ...) - dhw, 2010-07-24, 12:29
- Gradualism in Evolution (was Categories ...) - David Turell, 2010-07-24, 15:44
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-04, 15:47
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-05, 10:41
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-05, 15:30
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-06, 11:01
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-06, 15:58
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-07, 10:50
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-07, 15:58
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-08, 12:44
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-08, 17:16
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-09, 12:55
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-09, 14:30
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-10, 08:42
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-10, 16:08
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-11, 12:57
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-11, 15:29
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-12, 14:04
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-12, 15:47
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-13, 11:11
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-13, 17:28
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-14, 12:36
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-14, 18:59
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-15, 08:52
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-15, 18:20
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-16, 11:15
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-16, 15:15
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-17, 11:08
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-17, 16:54
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-17, 11:08
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-16, 15:15
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-16, 11:15
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-15, 18:20
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-15, 08:52
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-14, 18:59
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-14, 12:36
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-13, 17:28
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-13, 11:11
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-12, 15:47
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-12, 14:04
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-11, 15:29
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-11, 12:57
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-10, 16:08
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-10, 08:42
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-09, 14:30
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-09, 12:55
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-08, 17:16
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-08, 12:44
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-07, 15:58
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-07, 10:50
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-06, 15:58
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-06, 11:01
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-05, 15:30
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - dhw, 2020-10-05, 10:41
- Gradualism in Evolution not supported by genome studies - David Turell, 2020-10-04, 15:47
- Gradualism in Evolution (was Categories ...) - David Turell, 2010-07-24, 15:44
- Gradualism in Evolution (was Categories ...) - dhw, 2010-07-24, 12:29
- Gradualism in Evolution (was Categories ...) - George Jelliss, 2010-07-22, 00:24
- Gradualism in Evolution (was Categories ...) - David Turell, 2010-07-31, 14:25
- Gradualism in Evolution (was Categories ...) - dhw, 2010-08-01, 14:05
- Gradualism in Evolution: present or absent? - David Turell, 2017-08-03, 15:21
- Gradualism in Evolution: coelacanths show evolution - David Turell, 2021-02-09, 22:11
- Gradualism in Evolution: the role of transposons - David Turell, 2021-02-09, 22:32
- Gradualism in Evolution: present or absent? - David Turell, 2021-04-20, 15:32
- Gradualism in Evolution: coelacanths show evolution - David Turell, 2021-02-09, 22:11
- Gradualism in Evolution (was Categories ...) - dhw, 2010-07-19, 08:52
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-08-05, 14:46
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-08-05, 23:10
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-08-06, 00:05
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-08-06, 20:22
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-08-07, 14:52
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-08-06, 20:22
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-08-06, 00:05
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-08-05, 23:10
- Gradualism in Evolution (was Categories ...) - George Jelliss, 2010-07-10, 12:24
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-07-08, 21:24
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-07-06, 16:58
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - Tim, 2010-07-14, 02:48
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-07-14, 04:35
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - Tim, 2010-07-16, 00:10
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-07-16, 02:49
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-07-17, 14:44
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-07-16, 02:49
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - Tim, 2010-07-16, 00:38
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - Tim, 2010-07-16, 00:10
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-07-18, 20:19
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - Tim, 2010-07-19, 19:48
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-07-20, 11:36
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-07-22, 00:52
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-07-22, 18:09
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-07-23, 20:09
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-07-22, 18:09
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-07-22, 00:52
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-07-20, 11:36
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - Tim, 2010-07-19, 19:48
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-07-14, 04:35
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-07-04, 15:07
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-07-04, 14:24
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - Tim, 2010-07-04, 00:04
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-18, 23:13
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - xeno6696, 2010-02-19, 00:05
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-02-21, 20:22
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-02-21, 21:01
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-22, 13:48
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 14:00
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-22, 14:34
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 16:15
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-22, 14:34
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 14:00
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-02-22, 15:30
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 16:27
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - BBella, 2010-02-23, 05:22
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-23, 09:40
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-02-24, 23:24
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-25, 17:57
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-25, 18:02
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-02-28, 20:48
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-25, 17:57
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - David Turell, 2010-03-06, 00:42
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-03-07, 22:35
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - George Jelliss, 2010-02-24, 23:24
- Categories or Degrees of Existence - dhw, 2010-02-18, 23:02
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-15, 08:21 (The limitations of science)
- The limitations of science - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 16:46
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-16, 17:37
- The limitations of science - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 15:41
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-24, 23:15
- The limitations of science - xeno6696, 2010-02-25, 00:54
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-24, 23:15
- The limitations of science - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 15:41
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-16, 17:37
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-15, 19:46
- The limitations of science - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 22:07
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-16, 18:10
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-17, 00:14
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-17, 22:31
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-18, 12:20
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-18, 22:53
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-19, 11:42
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-19, 15:01
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-20, 12:47
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-20, 14:29
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-20, 16:15
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-20, 22:49
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-21, 01:21
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-21, 16:54
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-21, 17:38
- Evolution of Diversity (was The limitations of science) - George Jelliss, 2010-07-29, 21:57
- Evolution of Diversity (was The limitations of science) - David Turell, 2010-07-30, 02:45
- Evolution of Diversity (was The limitations of science) - dhw, 2010-07-30, 10:56
- Many thanks for your review! I really enjoyed seen this. - Lissa Siddons, 2011-11-19, 01:30
- I like the template of your blog! It looks really awesome. - Myles Jensrud, 2011-11-25, 09:24
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-20, 14:29
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-20, 12:47
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-19, 15:24
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-25, 23:44
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-28, 21:01
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-03-01, 17:31
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-03-02, 23:31
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-28, 21:01
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-25, 23:44
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-19, 15:01
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-19, 11:42
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-18, 22:53
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-18, 12:20
- The limitations of science - dhw, 2010-02-17, 22:31
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-17, 00:14
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-17, 23:39
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-18, 11:50
- The limitations of science - David Turell, 2010-02-18, 13:53
- The limitations of science - George Jelliss, 2010-02-18, 11:50
- The limitations of science - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 16:46
- Spirituality and the Brain - George Jelliss, 2010-02-13, 22:05 (Identity)
- Spirituality and the Brain - David Turell, 2010-02-14, 01:25
- Spirituality and the Brain - dhw, 2010-02-15, 08:50
- Spirituality and the Brain - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 16:23
- Spirituality and the Brain - dhw, 2010-05-23, 07:43
- Spirituality and the Brain - David Turell, 2010-05-23, 20:07
- Spirituality and the Brain - dhw, 2010-05-25, 12:10
- Spirituality and the Brain - dhw, 2010-05-30, 18:13
- Spirituality and the Brain - David Turell, 2010-06-01, 01:51
- Spirituality and the Brain - dhw, 2010-05-30, 18:13
- Spirituality and the Brain - dhw, 2010-05-25, 12:10
- Spirituality and the Brain - David Turell, 2010-05-23, 20:07
- Spirituality and the Brain - George Jelliss, 2010-03-14, 21:27
- Can one do tree of life from fossils alone - David Turell, 2010-02-13, 19:34 (Introduction)
- Can one do tree of life from fossils alone - xeno6696, 2010-02-13, 20:55
- Can one do tree of life from fossils alone - BBella, 2010-02-15, 23:29
- Can one do tree of life from fossils alone - George Jelliss, 2010-02-20, 23:14
- Can one do tree of life from fossils alone - David Turell, 2010-02-21, 01:11
- Can one do tree of life from fossils alone - xeno6696, 2010-02-13, 20:55
- Is punctuated equilibrium explained? - David Turell, 2010-02-12, 14:39 (Introduction)
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-10, 22:20 (Evolution)
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 14:44
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-17, 22:38
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-18, 01:25
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-20, 12:38
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-20, 19:00
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-20, 19:50
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-20, 22:01
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 17:38
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-21, 20:53
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 22:38
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 01:08
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-22, 22:59
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-23, 01:11
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-23, 03:24
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-23, 21:55
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-23, 03:24
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-23, 01:11
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-22, 22:59
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 01:08
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 22:38
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-21, 20:53
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 17:38
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-21, 17:06
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 18:07
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-22, 14:14
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 16:06
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-24, 23:10
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-25, 00:49
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-25, 18:27
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-25, 00:49
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-24, 23:10
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 16:06
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-22, 14:14
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-21, 19:44
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 22:51
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 00:45
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-22, 23:05
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-22, 00:45
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 22:51
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 18:07
- Turns out Random is Better - David Turell, 2010-02-20, 22:01
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-20, 12:38
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-18, 01:25
- Turns out Random is Better - dhw, 2010-02-17, 22:38
- Turns out Random is Better - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 14:44
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-10, 21:41 (The limitations of science)
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-13, 21:28
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-13, 23:00
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-14, 12:51
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-14, 16:48
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-14, 23:48
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 03:19
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-15, 19:34
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 21:33
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-16, 18:12
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-16, 21:59
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-16, 23:39
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 02:52
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 14:30
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-17, 17:39
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 18:42
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-17, 21:44
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-18, 01:12
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - David Turell, 2010-02-18, 06:01
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-18, 11:53
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-18, 12:29
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - David Turell, 2010-02-18, 13:58
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-18, 11:53
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-17, 21:44
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 18:42
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-17, 17:39
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 14:30
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 03:11
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 04:00
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 02:52
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-16, 23:39
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-16, 21:59
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-16, 18:12
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 21:33
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-15, 19:34
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-15, 03:19
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-14, 23:48
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-14, 16:48
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-14, 12:51
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-25, 23:05
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-02, 23:39
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - David Turell, 2010-03-02, 23:59
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-03, 16:11
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - David Turell, 2010-03-03, 23:11
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-04, 03:55
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-04, 14:54
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-06, 15:17
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-06, 22:20
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-06, 15:17
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - David Turell, 2010-03-03, 23:11
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-03, 16:11
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-03, 15:35
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-04, 14:45
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-04, 22:23
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-05, 21:40
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-06, 00:37
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-06, 22:07
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-07, 00:08
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-07, 22:43
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-08, 00:07
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-08, 20:01
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-10, 17:28
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - David Turell, 2010-03-11, 01:17
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-12, 13:53
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-17, 00:27
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-17, 20:57
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-17, 00:27
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-10, 17:28
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-08, 20:01
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-08, 00:07
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-07, 22:43
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-07, 00:08
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-06, 22:07
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-06, 00:37
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-05, 21:40
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-03-04, 22:23
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-04, 14:45
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - David Turell, 2010-03-02, 23:59
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - dhw, 2010-03-02, 23:39
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - xeno6696, 2010-02-13, 23:00
- Refutation of the \"Language-Only\" Interpretation of Math - George Jelliss, 2010-02-13, 21:28
- Thermal vents theory for origin of life - David Turell, 2010-02-08, 21:20 (Introduction)
- Thermal vents theory for origin of life - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 23:37
- Thermal vents theory for origin of life - David Turell, 2010-02-27, 14:12
- How to avoid lost entries - David Turell, 2010-02-08, 16:50 (Introduction)
- How to avoid lost entries - xeno6696, 2010-02-09, 03:15
- How to avoid lost entries - dhw, 2010-02-09, 11:35
- How to avoid lost entries - xeno6696, 2010-02-09, 03:15
- Behavioral Evolution Displayed in Robots - xeno6696, 2010-02-01, 20:48 (Introduction)
- Behavioral Evolution Displayed in Robots - dhw, 2010-02-02, 12:25
- Behavioral Evolution Displayed in Robots - xeno6696, 2010-02-03, 03:36
- Behavioral Evolution Displayed in Robots - dhw, 2010-02-02, 12:25
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - David Turell, 2010-01-26, 17:21 (Introduction)
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - xeno6696, 2010-02-01, 14:04
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - David Turell, 2010-02-01, 14:52
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - xeno6696, 2010-02-01, 15:55
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - xeno6696, 2010-02-01, 16:05
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - David Turell, 2010-02-02, 16:16
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - George Jelliss, 2010-04-03, 18:10
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - David Turell, 2010-04-04, 03:55
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - dhw, 2010-04-04, 14:51
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - George Jelliss, 2010-04-05, 19:29
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - David Turell, 2010-04-05, 21:05
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - George Jelliss, 2010-04-05, 19:29
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - George Jelliss, 2010-04-03, 18:10
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - xeno6696, 2010-02-01, 15:55
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - David Turell, 2010-02-01, 14:52
- How DNA might have developed; a brilliant new theory - xeno6696, 2010-02-01, 14:04
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 14:43 (Introduction)
- Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 17:17
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 19:28
- Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 19:48
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-26, 19:32
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-27, 14:59
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-28, 17:07
- Back to irreducible complexity - dhw, 2010-01-29, 17:25
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-01-29, 17:31
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-01-30, 14:47
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-01-31, 11:54
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-01-31, 17:25
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-01-31, 11:54
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 02:51
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-08, 04:46
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 13:00
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-08, 16:46
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 23:33
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 01:13
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 01:37
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-09, 02:43
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 16:42
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 01:13
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 23:33
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-09, 11:42
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-09, 11:57
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-10, 00:37
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-10, 14:04
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-10, 17:48
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-11, 11:02
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 20:49
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-23, 09:35
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-24, 00:19
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-23, 09:35
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-21, 20:49
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-11, 11:02
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-10, 17:48
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-10, 14:04
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-08, 16:46
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 13:00
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-02-08, 13:14
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 23:17
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-09, 01:01
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - xeno6696, 2010-02-08, 23:17
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-02-08, 04:46
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - David Turell, 2010-01-30, 14:47
- Back to irreducible complexity (PART TWO) - dhw, 2010-01-29, 17:31
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-02, 14:52
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-05, 23:33
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-06, 01:19
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-05, 23:33
- Back to irreducible complexity - dhw, 2010-01-29, 17:25
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-28, 17:07
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-27, 14:59
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-01-23, 19:28
- Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-02-16, 11:43
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-16, 14:52
- Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 14:50
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-18, 05:56
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-19, 19:13
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-18, 05:56
- Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-02-17, 14:50
- Back to irreducible complexity - David Turell, 2010-02-16, 14:52
- Back to irreducible complexity - xeno6696, 2010-01-23, 17:17