Computer \"reads\" memories... (Humans)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Sunday, March 21, 2010, 16:04 (5360 days ago) @ David Turell


> ...The neural network of an IQ of 150 will be much more complex than an IQ of 110. One will be able to measure the intensity of thought, not the exact thought. From a deist standpoint, not to worry.-Heh. Except that well-rested, that neural network of 110 will consistently outperform an overworked and overstimulated 150. -I haven't had an IQ test since high school, but I'll openly admit that on the two occasions I took the test, I scored 90 and 120, respectively. The types of questions asked were of course, logic games, but I had never seen questions of the type before when I had taken it at a 90. -This same mind essentially failed his GRE math exam last summer too, but again this was due to exposure of the types of questions. The kids who score 700-800 on these typically drill every day the year leading up to them, as they had with their SAT/ACT exams in secondary school. -As for the second part, the brain undoubtedly has an encoding scheme for storing information, and this is one of the few things I am QUITE confident that we'll be able to discover. If you're familiar with the concept of B-trees, its quite easy to see theoretically how a neural net makes it incredibly easy to retrieve information. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/B-Tree-Viewed as a program, it doesn't explain how a mind initiates the calling procedure to access a memory--and I think it is THIS process that you believe can't be measured. We'll see. By the time I'm 60, I think we'll have the ability to implant computer components in our heads, and this will require some knowledge on how our minds transmit information.-http://www.streammygame.com/smg/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=13-Here's a consumer-level device that will allow mental control of a mouse.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"