De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? (The limitations of science)
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0005708 > > > > > > Apparently a codon scheme with a greater amount of codons than the three we presently have results in a genome that doesn't need ribosomes in order to transcript DNA--a less complex system than what we have now. > > > > Interesting article, but odd ball findings not in our line of descent. > > We don't know that!-OK, that's true, but it still doesn't get us past the origin of information in the DNA code at time-zero for the beginning of life.
Complete thread:
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
xeno6696,
2010-02-23, 23:01
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
David Turell,
2010-02-23, 23:12
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
xeno6696,
2010-02-24, 00:26
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
David Turell,
2010-02-24, 01:38
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
xeno6696,
2010-02-24, 15:28
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-28, 20:34
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? - David Turell, 2010-03-01, 17:20
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-28, 20:34
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
xeno6696,
2010-02-24, 15:28
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
David Turell,
2010-02-24, 01:38
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
xeno6696,
2010-02-24, 00:26
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
David Turell,
2010-02-23, 23:12