De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? (The limitations of science)
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0005708 > > > > Apparently a codon scheme with a greater amount of codons than the three we presently have results in a genome that doesn't need ribosomes in order to transcript DNA--a less complex system than what we have now. > > Interesting article, but odd ball findings not in our line of descent.-We don't know that!
--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"
\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"
Complete thread:
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
xeno6696,
2010-02-23, 23:01
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
David Turell,
2010-02-23, 23:12
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
xeno6696,
2010-02-24, 00:26
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
David Turell,
2010-02-24, 01:38
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
xeno6696,
2010-02-24, 15:28
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-28, 20:34
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? - David Turell, 2010-03-01, 17:20
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
George Jelliss,
2010-02-28, 20:34
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
xeno6696,
2010-02-24, 15:28
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
David Turell,
2010-02-24, 01:38
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
xeno6696,
2010-02-24, 00:26
- De-Evolution for the origin of the Triple-Codon? -
David Turell,
2010-02-23, 23:12