The Big Bang (Origins)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Thursday, May 06, 2010, 20:13 (5313 days ago) @ David Turell


> > George's belief in the theory that a universe can spring from nothing is consistent with his belief that life can assemble itself without any guiding intelligence.
> 
> Here is a discussion of chirality of amino acids from a math probability view that totally negates George's theory, using math, a field of George's expertise:
> 
> http://procrustes.blogtownhall.com/2010/04/27/homochirality_and_darwin.thtml
&a... -Ah. I now know why I had an english teacher proclaim that "Pasteur proved that evolution didn't happen." -I know that's not what the site said, but good god that guy could learn how to condense his writing. I'll analyze the math later.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"