Theodicy: solution lies in definition of God (Introduction)

by David Turell @, Sunday, September 05, 2021, 15:03 (345 days ago) @ dhw

DAVID: But do the human words have the same meaning when applied to non-human God?

dhw: It is you and I who are using the words. When you say you are sure your God enjoys creating and watches us with interest, is all-powerful and full of good intentions, you know perfectly well what you mean. The question is not what the words mean - we both know what they mean - but whether the statement is true or not!

DAVID: But they mean descriptions in human terms. God is not human, so how do they apply?

dhw: They apply to your God in exactly the same way as they apply to us, because as you rightly say over and over again in different words and degrees, the creation (us) certainly/probably/ possibly mimics the creator. The Bible puts it rather nicely: he created us in his image. I reckon most of us would not interpret that as meaning that he and we have two eyes, ears, arms and legs. Do you really not understand the meaning of the terms you have used above?

My terms have the same meaning your terms have. The problem of application to God still apply. I take the 'image' as totally mental.

dhw: The question is why does evil exist if God is all-good? Your answer: because he’s strong and tries to correct errors, and one day we shall find out his good intentions for deliberately creating “bad” things. My suggestion: he gave all life forms the freedom to pursue their own means of survival, and so what we call “bad” is the consequence of that freedom, epitomized by the manner in which some humans use their freedom to further their self-interest at the expense of others.

DAVID: I can certainly accept this view, since I have previously proposed that when good bacteria venture into bad places they act badly. Your statement conflates two different issues. We are agreeing (I think) on freedom of action causing trouble…..

dhw: Wonderful! Thank you for accepting the concept of a free-for-all as a solution to the problem of theodicy.

DAVID: ...but biochemical mistakes are a very different issue, and you do not seem to understand the speed requires means some molecule will not act properly, miss-fold or whatever other mistake can happen. I think God could only make life this way. Errorless biochemical life cannot exist.

dhw: I understand. I am only surprised that your all-powerful God was apparently unable to find an errorless way of designing life (I’d prefer to imagine that he actually wanted to create it this way...I’ll explain why if you’d like me to), and that he apparently even provided ways of correcting some of the errors, but despite his omnipotence couldn’t manage it with some, and so apparently left it to us humans to do what he couldn’t do.

I have no idea what you prefer to imagine about God, b ut I am convinced God could do no better with this form of life He created. Can there be any other form? I doubt it.

Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum