Consciousness; a radically new theory. Diaphonous? (Introduction)

by romansh , Saturday, July 18, 2015, 14:04 (3415 days ago) @ David Turell

I think it is quite clear. You are making a fuss over the fact that the brain bridges gaps and adds info, yet the results of human endeavor are there to see. the brain does not get in our way. It is built to help. 
The fuss I am making is the claim that you made that our consciousness is seamless. It is not. It just seems that way. The seamlessness is an illusion.-> Even if memorized, when thoughts appear they are immaterial. Another sidestep.
What they appear like is not what is under question.- 
> Would you be willing to describe it?
I have a memory ... as a three year old or thereabouts I fell down the stairs ... I can still recall as I tumbled head over heels watching myself fall from the top of the stairs and at the same time I could see myself watching me watch me fall. -Of course this memory is no longer trustworthy ... in that it has been taken out of the bag and put back in many times. 
 
> You have forgotten the references I have given you. Google Pim van Lommel. M.D., Bruce Greyson, M.D. for starters.
And in which medical journals were their studies on a universal consciousness published?-
Ultimately what we are claiming here is the material influences immaterial world and in turn the immaterial influences the material world.