Consciousness; a radically new theory. Romansh? (Introduction)

by David Turell , Tuesday, July 07, 2015, 14:38 (3209 days ago) @ romansh


> > David: Obviously , if here are third party conformations of the events the patient describes, the time is known, as in may of the case descriptions. The problem with your response is your lack of recognition that in these recorded events the brain is not functional by every test available to medical science. The patient is therefore not conscious, and this is a much deeper state of absent consciousness than surgical anesthesia when the brain is obviously functional. The patient observes events with third party confirmation (veridical). This is what is not explained by our current knowledge or lack of knowledge about consciousness. To the M.D.'s I've listed, myself included, this is startling finding.
> 
> Romansh: The bit in red is a huge fallacy. -And how do you know this? 
> 
> Romansh: I appreciate you concern for my conformation bias. My reading time is finite, so I must pick and choose carefully what I read. Your arguments I have found strongly unconvincing.-But you are guy who asked for references. Why?