Genome complexity: A code within a code? (Introduction)

by David Turell , Saturday, May 30, 2015, 20:29 (3254 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained


> > David: My point has always been how much complexity do you need before one recognizes it has to have been designed? With all the interlocking parts, it cannot be done one step at a time.
> 
> Tony: And I certainly agree with that. Interestingly, if you say "it cannot be done one step at a time", that precludes most definitions of evolution, and certainly precludes common descent.-Unless you choose my choice of theories: God guided an evolutionary process of His invention. The patterns of phonotype and the patterns of genes means to me He set up patterns to be used and the process followed very naturally. There are so many instants of apparent saltation that step-by-step is only Darwin's thought, with no proof. And now epigenetic research brings back Lamarkism. I view Darwin theory of evolution as dead.