Genome complexity: lesser species; Hunter questions (Introduction)

by David Turell , Tuesday, May 05, 2015, 01:29 (3273 days ago) @ David Turell

How do epigenetic markers arise in evolution? No one knows. Cornelius Hunter points out the fallacies in Darwinian thinking:-http://darwins-god.blogspot.com/2015/05/chuan-he-evolution-created-epigenetics.html-"Under evolution, the protein machines that attach the epigenetic markers must have fortuitously evolved from random mutations. But placing markers would not have helped if they were not in the right place, and in response to the right environmental signals. In fact, such protein machines could easily wreak havoc if they weren't working just right.-" But even given all that, such a marvel would do no good. That is because a tiny methyl group, or any other epigenetic marker, must be interpreted by other molecular machines. In other words, there must also have evolved the machines needed to recognize and perform the appropriate regulatory actions, as indicated by the given marker.-" Evolution requires an enormous sequence of random mutations to occur before fitness improvements could be realized."-An absolutely logical set of reasons why random mutation cannot work. So we are back to an IM or direct guidance. And I must insist with this set of reasons the IM must have guidance.