Brain complexity: evolves in spurts? (Introduction)

by David Turell , Tuesday, February 09, 2016, 20:44 (3210 days ago) @ David Turell

New monkey skull research suggests the brain develops in size and function in spurts. Punctuated equilibrium, not Darwin tiny steps, once again:-http://phys.org/news/2016-02-monkey-skull-brain-evolved-spurts.html-"For many years, researchers believed that superior intelligence in humans was attributable to our brain size—that the large size of our brain relative to the size of the rest of our body was what set us apart. But subsequent studies found that other animals had ratios that were even more pronounced than ours, suggest thing it must be something else. In this new study, the researchers propose that it was changes to the size of certain parts of the brain that led to increases in cognitive abilities, and that it happened in spurts.-"The team came to these conclusions by studying the skulls of 179 adult platyrrhines (which included 49 species and samples of both genders)—a type of new world monkey. The researchers added data from the skulls into modeling software that was also able to take into account evolutionary changes. In studying the models, the researchers found that the brains of the monkeys underwent two distinct periods of evolutionary change. The first came about as the monkeys began moving around on the ground more, allowing them to obtain new types of food. That led, the researchers assert, to an enlarged neocortex, which forced the brain to shift on its axis, pushing the brain stem farther down. The next spurt came about, they believe when the monkeys became more social—that led to a less expanded prefrontal area. The models showed that the brain changed to meet changing circumstances, the team suggests, eventually leading to the shape the monkeys have now.-"Because humans are also primates, the researchers suggest that it seems reasonable to conclude that our brains grew in spurts as well during similar situations of our history, and because of that suggest that it was not just growth in overall brain size that led to our superior intellect, but the growth of certain parts that were used heavily as we evolved." -Comment: Doesn't fit Darwin, and supports Denton's view that structuralism rather than functionalism drives evolution. See the Denton book forward review which is accurate, as I am reading the book. (Thursday, February 04, 2016, 15:42)