Cosmology: quantum space time not Einsteinian (Introduction)

by Balance_Maintained @, U.S.A., Monday, March 30, 2015, 02:55 (3528 days ago) @ David Turell


> > Tony: The link between radiometric dating and lightspeed
> > 
> > Question: Is there a direct link between radiometric dating and the speed of light?
> > 
> > Setterfield: Yes, there is. 'c', the speed of light, is in the numerator of every reduced radio decay rate equation.
> > 
> > Question: Could you please explain to me in simple terms why the rate of atomic decay depends upon the speed of light?
> > 
> > Setterfield: Atomic decay rates do not depend on the speed of light. Both are, however, 'children' of the same parent -- the Zero Point Energy. Because of this, and because the speed of light is in the numerator of every reduced radio decay rate equation, any changes in the speed of light are indicating changes in atomic decay rates.
> 
> Since the speed of light doesn't change, as far as it has been demonstrated, I still don't see how c makes any difference. The objection does not use the whole equation.-Because, that article you referenced would mean that the speed of light is not constant at all wavelengths. Which is an argument that has been made repeatedly, but ignored.-
"Lower-energy light with its longer wavelengths would be akin to an ocean liner, gliding through the foamy quantum sea largely undisturbed. Light of higher energy and shorter wavelengths, on the other hand, would be more like a small dinghy battling through the waves."

--
What is the purpose of living? How about, 'to reduce needless suffering. It seems to me to be a worthy purpose.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum