Re: dhw--Epistemological Framework (Order of Rank?) (Humans)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Tuesday, February 01, 2011, 03:28 (4852 days ago) @ dhw

dhw,
> My 24 January post is not, therefore, moving towards anything deeper. The frame is not the picture! However, I don't expect it to be complete, and I don't expect all my comments to be acceptable to everyone, which is why I thought it would lead to further discussion. But if you're happy with it as it stands, I shall give myself a little pat on the back, and next time someone confuses knowledge with belief, or takes his own hierarchies for granted, I shall only have to murmur: twenty-four-one-eleven. Except, of course, that you Americans would say one-twenty-four-eleven. No wonder we can never understand each other!-Yes, only your recent post has stressed to me that I don't see how its possible to subvert the order of rank...-I actually considered this part of a framework. We've got the skeleton, but no meat...

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"