Junk DNA: goodbye!: RNA many new uses (Introduction)

by Balance_Maintained , U.S.A., Friday, July 03, 2020, 07:54 (1605 days ago) @ David Turell

**

"Evolutionists have already failed this burgeoning field by relegating RNAs they didn’t understand to the “genetic junk” bin. And ever since, after all these years of discovery, all they can do is speculate about what “might have evolutionary underpinnings.” This is a great time for design advocates to read the messages in RNA and find out what they are saying." (my bold)

Davids Comment: A typical ID article pointing out how the research in RNA has opened a huge field for new discoveries. As the last paragraph sows, ID design experts will have different interpretations of the 'facts'.

Well, he's not wrong. Evolutionary biologist did relegate what they didn't understand, and have thus spent decades being surprised. The reason that their 'surprise' is so telling is that a good scientific theory makes predictions, and you're only surprised when the predictions are wrong. The extreme level of complexity makes the entire prospect of random chance and natural selection relatively ludicrous, but then, the entire theory of evolution has too much of a strangle hold to be dislodged by something as inconvenient as facts or the scientific method. As theories go, it has been wrong a lot.... like a lot a lot.

--
What is the purpose of living? How about, 'to reduce needless suffering. It seems to me to be a worthy purpose.