Innovation (Introduction)

by BBella @, Tuesday, May 07, 2013, 23:11 (4219 days ago) @ David Turell


> > dhw: there is no single universal intelligence, but only individual intelligences which continue to cooperate.
> 
> david: Jumping off in every direction. Your proposal has no sense of coordination or similarity in organisms.-But, if we accept the quantum connection and/or Sheldrake's morphic field, don't we then have the connection which creates similarity in organisms?
 
> > dhw: the second is confined to the realities we know of (the universe and life). What would Ockham say?
> 
>david: That your proposial has no basis in what we are learning. As life, studied in organic chemistry, is shown to have increasing complexity that requires a strong consideration for design and planning. Occam would say that life is one phenomenon that requies complexity, not simplicity. He would conclude, as a priest, that a designer is necessary.-For me, the real question isn't whether there is one single creator "entity" or many, within or without. All creation could be (and most likely is) connected at a single quantum level regardless of either. Let's say, for discussion sake, that this single quantum level is at a vibratory state within all that is. From this level all that is has been and is created. The real question then becomes, for me: Is this single vibratory level self aware in the sense of a human self awareness, or is it self aware on a deeper level in the sense that every movement affects all that is on that vibratory level and so everything is aware of everything else on that level, so could be called self-aware in that sense?


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum