Cell response to electric field (Introduction)

by David Turell , Tuesday, April 23, 2013, 15:29 (4233 days ago) @ dhw


> DAVID: Not true! The science of evolution expressly shows that the genome is an automaton. The atheists depend on this viewpoint. Otherwise they have to identify the source of the intelligent information in the code. The code simply invented itself by chance(!), no source (God) of intelligent information required.
> 
> Neither the theist nor the atheist hypothesis need depend on the genome being an automaton. The theist can argue that his God invented a mechanism that could act intelligently and independently (as we humans think we do). The atheist can argue that this same mechanism was assembled through cooperation between materials after non-conscious energy had become aware of itself through changes in the materials it had produced and in which it was embedded.-You do not answer my point: DNA is a digital code, and the atheists avoid any discussion of the fact that the information contained therein has to have a source. Our experience in life says that all codes require intelligence. Now you want to protect the atheists by siding with the idea that chance created that intricate mechanism in DNA. Don't invent theist arguments, they already have the telling point, the origin for the source of the information cannot be chance. And non-conscious energy flows everyday through your house wires, but I'm sure you have not noticed any changes occurring automatically or purposely.Perhaps non-conscious energy is causing global warming. After all we are surrounded by non-consciouis energy all our lives. You make non-conscious energy seem brilliant.