near to death episodes (Endings)

by David Turell , Friday, February 29, 2008, 02:28 (6111 days ago) @ dhw

The van pommel article I referred to in Lancet is the first article in the bibliography at the end of his article. The major issue is how do these people report such clear episodes as they have no cerebral function as shown by the flat EEG. George really misses the point of all this by trying to invent a story of how the patient knew who had his teeth. As all Darwinists do, they invent just-so stories to 'explain' what cannot be explained. Van Pommel is so impressed by his findings that he has done a lot more searching. Lancet, as one of the world's leading journals, is very careful about what is printed. That the article passed their judgement indicates its scientific worth. It was a prospective study that related these episodes to subsequent mortality. Extremely impressive. This cannot be explained as the operation of the neurons of brain machinery. Something else is going on, but what?