Ontological Arguments (Humans)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Wednesday, September 29, 2010, 01:16 (5169 days ago) @ David Turell


> > Because if God IS energy, than we must admit that God is limited by it. If God itself is everything; the singularity until now, then clearly he didn't have the power to do what he want when he wanted. And, as I conjectured in a long-dead thread here, God's ability to influence the world slowly dies over time as energy becomes less and less concentrated. 
> > 
> > This is a little more "Process-oriented" than most would like, but it makes sense as what has been observed.
> 
> What if God can create more energy than was present in the beginning? You assume that the intial energy was all there is. How did we get something from nothing in the first place, thank you, Leibnitz? Remember I'm the guy who is most comfortable with God in and out of the universe.-Then you raise the spectre of "what caused God?" But to answer your question, we have no reason to believe that there was more energy than what is in our universe, unless you want to appeal to String theory and Branes.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"