Ontological Arguments (Humans)

by xeno6696 @, Sonoran Desert, Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 01:53 (5170 days ago) @ David Turell

David,-As a correction, Godel's theorem doesn't say "We can't prove everything" it says that for any given axiomatic set there will always be one enumeration that won't appear in the set. What this means is that it is not possible to have a complete set of consistent theorems across all of mathematics. You can have pure consistency and be incomplete, or be complete with no consistency. -So are you saying that you prefer complete theories with no consistency?

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum