Ontological Arguments (Humans)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 23:33 (5169 days ago) @ David Turell


> > The basic idea is simply and understatedly, God is energy. My theory is based off of a couple of things:
> > 
> > Energy and Mass are interchangeable. (I.e. if God is energy, creating mass is a non-issue)
> > Energy/Mass can neither be created nor destroyed, it can only change forms, and therefore is eternal.
> > Everything, in all places, is connected by energy. (interconnectedness of all things, including mankind's tenuous link to God)
> > All of our thoughts and feelings are created by energy. Therefore, if god is energy he would be capable of thought, i.e. intelligence and emotion.
> > 
> > There are some other things that I am less sure of, though they would seem to fit.
> > 
> > A)Energy can be manipulated by intent.(implying some kind of link between human thought processes and manipulation of energy beyond their physical body.) 
> > 
> > B)If energy can be manipulated, then, as energy and mass are interchangeable, by association, mass must be able to be manipulated as well. 
> 
> Very close to my own thinking. In College our philosophy prof told us: consciousness is energy on the 'inside', 'matter' is energy on the outside. Stuck like glue to me. It has to be right.-I've always hated it when statements assert their own validity; that said, this is an intuitive way of looking at it.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"