Ontological Arguments (Humans)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Tuesday, September 28, 2010, 23:30 (5169 days ago) @ David Turell


> > At the same time, if God is energy, and energy and mass are (essentially) the same thing; how/where does the interface happen between God and universe? I'm into the 4th chapter of Martin's book, and though he hasn't gone into it, he resorts to extradimensionality as one argument. He appeals to this to describe what seems to be our unlimited memory capacity.
> 
> Why does there have to be an interface? If God is energy and both within and without the universe, He is part of everything. When I realized I had, to my satisfaction, proven God beyond a reasonable doubt, I had a feeling in my body like the two times that I found myself deeply in love. Faith and emotion are intertwined in the intellect; faith is part emotion. I'm like Spinoza, perhaps due to our background, but he thought emotion would overcome reason and I think reason can be separated at times.-To me, there 'has' to be an interface if we're going to cite God as prime cause for physical matter; otherwise we have have an impossibility. -God as energy could simply be an assertion that energy in the universe itself followed a path of development. God's creating will was however limited.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"