Convoluted human evolution: Tattersall's take (Introduction)

by BBella , Sunday, February 21, 2016, 19:12 (3198 days ago) @ David Turell
edited by BBella, Sunday, February 21, 2016, 19:28

When I say the origin of the mechanism is unknown, I am acknowledging a void....... and mine is an inventive mechanism within the organisms themselves. Two voids, three inventions to fill each void, and none of these inventions are based on human experience because no human has ever experienced the unique origin of the evolutionary mechanism or the unique process whereby bacteria have evolved into humans.
> 
> But with a look at the biochemistry of life your solution is no better than Darwin's chance. The IM wants as advance. It will need to have two organic molecules to interact. to do this the IM must find can enzyme to facilitate the reaction, Otherwise the reaction will take 3K to 120K years to do the reaction. An enzyme is many thousands of atoms, C,O, H, N, S, P, etc., and usually a metal like Zinc. It must be set up in proper 3-D, and must have two lock/key areas in proper relationship to hold the two molecules for the reaction to take place, which it will do instantly or else life won't work. Unless the IM has cognitive teleology it must now search the universe of possible enzyme molecules in all sizes and shapes and possible metals to find just the right one among millions of possibilities. This is just like Darwin hunt-and-peck. Just what attributes do you wish to apply to the IM so it isn't like Darwin? That is why I so strongly resist your third-way solution. Planning must occur!-I believe that it is here, at this point mentioned in your thoughts above, that Sheldrakes Morphogenic Resonance within the Morphogenic field comes into play, drawing different aspects of information within the field of "what Is" together to create the next level of "what Is". This is change using the fabric: Quantum Potential.