Proof of ID (Introduction)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Monday, December 16, 2013, 02:10 (3996 days ago) @ David Turell

Testable hypothesis:
> 
> http://p2c.com/students/blogs/truthquest/2013/10/scientific-method-detect-intelligent-d... 
> This argument is why I believe in ID-"Hypothesis: An attribute that is unique to minds is the ability to produce statistically significant levels of functional information or functional complexity."-Here's where this hypothesis fails. It is also equally possible for a mind to LIE. That is, given that a mind can "... produce statistically significant levels of functional information or functional complexity" it is also EQUALLY possible that a mind can PRETEND "...to produce statistically significant levels of functional information or functional complexity."-For this hypothesis to be scientific, you are REQUIRED to make at least one assumption, an assumption that I say is so revolutionary and improbable, that the hypothesis can be rejected before you even make it to the testing phase. -1. The mind that created the universe never tells a lie. -It is my intent, that my argument ends here. Because ID immediately fails without this assumption. (There are more, but this is the most damning.)

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"