Intelligent design (Introduction)

by Abel , Monday, November 14, 2011, 22:42 (4736 days ago) @ David Turell
edited by unknown, Monday, November 14, 2011, 22:53

[David: "He wants send his 'cells'. Will they be on as slide for microscopic view? I can do that. Is there something unusual I can see. How will he prove what he sent are his cells? Will he send living cells in tissue culture? Those can go to a DNA lab."[/i]

David, I was thinking of sending you some samples of my skin immersed in mineral oil on a couple of microscope slides with cover slips. An microscopic examination will reveal that each of my cells possess three nuclei, not one. I am aware of no other animal on the planet whose cells possess three nuclei. Thus the samples I will send you are unique.

I already know what a DNA analysis will show, though I have never had one done. It will show that ~98% of my genome is human which falls within normal deviations between the races of man. Just like the DNA of the aliens will show that they are primarily human, though they don't look it.

David: "Don't you think it is time to rename this thread? Nothing is intelligent about Abel's claims."

Given that I believe that intelligent men are stupid all the time David, you may have just unintentionally given me quite a compliment. As I had mentioned before I have a gift when it come to sorting truths from lies, that gift is wisdom.

So though it is the intelligence of engineers and architects that receives all the glory for the vision of their creations, it is the wisdom of simple craftsmen that brings that vision to life. It is not surprising that it was not the genius of engineers or scientists that taught this world to erect obelisks again after that secret was lost to intellectual erosion, it was the simple wisdom of a craftsman.

And though many of this world's scientists and engineers have wondered for centuries how such massive stones as the obelisks could have been moved many miles from where they were quarried to where they were erected, none of those scientists or engineers has ever solved the problem. Of course I won't argue that these are and were some very intelligent men, however the solution to that mystery eludes them. Perhaps they should have asked for the guidance of a not-so-intelligent craftsman, just as this world's research physicians have learned to accept and respect his not-so-intelligent opinions.

Let me pose this question to you David:

Let say you needed to move a large stone in primitive times that needed one thousand tons of force to budge. To move this stone with human power an engineer might need to have 20,000 men pulling 100 pounds each. This certainly is a lot of men and a lot of work.

A craftsman using a few tools and a specially built road, could move that same stone with two hundred men and some those men would be riding on the rock while others rested in the shade.

So tell me, if you were making payroll David, which man would you hire, the intelligent engineer or the not-so-intelligent craftsman?