Intelligent design (Introduction)

by Abel , Friday, October 28, 2011, 01:35 (4776 days ago) @ Abel

Of course you must realize by now, that if I don't believe that abiogenesis occured in matter as we understand it, it must have occurred in matter of a type that we don't understand. This, of course, is dark matter.

Simple odds would dictate abiogenesis would occur first in the largest pool of matter even if one disregarded the impossibility of that event occurring in matter as we understand it. Since dark matter represents the majority of the matter in the universe, it has a statistical edge over matter of a more conventional sort.

But what is dark matter and how much of it is there really out there? According to gravitational studies, it represents 83% of the matter in the universe. That's a lot, but is that number correct? The answer is no. It actually represents over 99.9% of the matter in our universe.

Of course you're probably pulling your hair out at this point, wondering, "how could I possibly believe that?". And that is a very long story. A story that should begin with, "I am not a liar", but as a scientist, I do have to consider that I could be deluded, as do you. But be assured that I will not knowingly mislead you.

Since I was a child, I could see ghosts. A relatively recent encounter with hostile spirits opened the eyes of my soul for a time to the world of dark matter that exists around us. I could see clearly for miles, straight through walls as if they were ghostly too. The world beneath my feet was composed of a patch work quilt of different colored fogs (homochiralic pools of gas), that varied from region to region as if the stuff was being loosely associated with matter as we know it (matter of a feather flocks together).

I had the opportunity to watch this misty dark matter as it fell in our gravitational field. By my calculations, dark matter is only subject to about 2%
of the effects of earth's gravitational field. If we are only subject to 2% of dark matter's gravitational field, then there is 50 times more dark matter in the universe that we even suspect.

At this point you must think that I am insane (I know I would). I have often considered that perhaps what I saw, felt and heard was just a full-blown hallucination and as such I could just disregard the whole event. There is just one annoying thing that is keeping from the comforts of knowing that I am nuts: I have evidence that proves what happened to me was very real.

The evidence that I possess is a piece of dark matter technology that was designed by the first race. That technology emits a frequency of light that is absorbed by the cell walls of bacteria specifically "microwaving" them while leaving normal tissues unharmed. I have tested it many times on myself and my cats, it works very well.

Explaining what dark matter is requires delving into dimensional and temporal physics. I'm not talking about a multiverse here or "vibrational" planes or anything like that. I don't buy that crap and it is certainly not necessary to explain dark matter. For the sake of brevity, at this time, I will define dark matter as "temporally saturated matter" and matter as we understand it to be "temporally polarized matter". And for the sake of future discussions: "time is not suspended in space" but rather "space is suspended in time".

Think on this and we shall discuss it later.

dhw1: "I’d like to ask you first about your claims concerning Adam and Eve. You believe the OT is primarily myth with a few kernels of truth, so it would be interesting to know how you distinguish between myth and truth. Why, for instance, do you believe that Adam and Eve were real people? When you say “man was here for a very long time before Adam and Eve”, do you mean the forerunners of homo sapiens, or humans like us? Did your gods specially create Adam and Eve? If so, how did the earlier humans get here? I agree that some of the OT (written by many different authors) may relate to historical fact, but why Genesis, which has less chance than most of being called historical?

I have a gift when it comes to spotting the truth. Though I know I was born with some of this ability, its' development was most certainly aided by my father, a man with a quirky sense of humor. It was routine for him to try to feed me some line of crap just to see if the fish were biting. It took some time, but I learned to judge the message, not the messenger. Kernels of truth are those that ring true or might be true (for the sake of compromise). I prefer those truths that have been backed up by a more scholarly source than the bible.

When I said that man was here for a very long time before Adam and Eve, I meant both the forerunners of man and man. Adam and Eve were not created from the ground up as the bible says, they were both born of human mothers who were implanted with a modified and fertilized egg. This is how all the apes were evolved into men. One generation at a time.

I chose Genesis for a number of reasons. One, if humanity is ever going to quit fighting about its' origins, a middle ground has to be found between theists, atheists and agnostics. Genesis, if interpreted properly, can provide that middle ground.

This thread is getting a bit long so I will continue on the next.