Cell Memories (Identity)

by David Turell , Thursday, August 14, 2014, 01:52 (3537 days ago) @ dhw


> dhw: Nobody said it was. Taking something for granted is not the same as knowing it for a fact! You wrote, concerning the Cambrian: “I assume God stepped in.” You then wrote: “I do not prefer dabbling as the method He used.” Your two statements are contradictory. We bulldog British never let go. Give in.-No they are not: Assumption is not fact. The Cambrian looks like dabbling, but I repeat, I prefer a full pre-programming. My preference proves nothing, so I am stuck with theistic evolution with no knowledge of the method employed.
> 
> dhw: All three hypotheses fit the history of evolution. The fact that you don't believe my hypothesis is irrelevant.-If your cells are smart enough all three hypothesis fit. Your cells can't hunt and peck their way to the future designs. They are too dumb. Your wishing them some reall intelligence is only wishing.