How reliable is science? (Assumption 2/7) (The limitations of science)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Thursday, April 26, 2012, 00:00 (4593 days ago) @ DragonsHeart

I'm going to interject a small bit here and agree that INTJs just don't care about the layman, which is completely true. If an INTJ, of any age, is talking about something of their interest, they really don't care one bit about whether or not the layman can understand what they are saying. I see this EXACT pattern with my son, who is very much an INTJ. His big thing for a few years were Bakugan, of which his father and I really know nothing, but our son just talked on and on about them, not giving "two shits" if we understood him or not. Granted, my son is young, almost 9, but he is already leaning towards the science and math fields. He is very interested in them.-To get him past the INTJ "Communication hurdle" I would suggest a strategy of the logical basis for teams and the importance of clear, concise communication. -It's a TON of effort to talk on someone else's level, but when you realize that you NEED these people to understand you in order for you to accomplish, in my case, project goals--it's a skill you just gotta have. -(I'm an INTJ myself.) -But remember... we think about emotions as if they were logical playthings... That kind of thing is really, really difficult for any xxFx to understand.

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"