How reliable is science? (The limitations of science)

by xeno6696 , Sonoran Desert, Sunday, April 15, 2012, 01:56 (4604 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained
edited by unknown, Sunday, April 15, 2012, 02:05

After two generations of misdiagnosis leading to premature death for millions without a shred of responsibility. Hitler does it and he is called a villain, science does it and its just part of the process.-Wow... you're one for melodrama aren't you?-Hitler deliberately did what he did. Hitler hated Jews, he deliberately marked them as separate from society, and slowly enacted a program of methodical extinction. -The doctors you cite all take the same Hippocratic oath. Some of them enacted (and developed, or helped develop) treatments that according to what they knew--worked. -We don't know, what we don't know.-The doctors opposing the hypothesis you discussed, did what they did believing that what they did was better for their patients. They weren't taking their patients, marking them off as [arbitrarily] inferior, and sending them to die in gas chambers.-Comparing Hitler's "final solution" to THAT is pure, [melodramatic] histrionics.-[EDITED]

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"