Radiometric Dating (The limitations of science)

by Balance_Maintained , U.S.A., Tuesday, October 21, 2014, 21:24 (3684 days ago) @ David Turell

I follow this guys news letters every month, and for an engineer, he makes some very well reasoned arguments. 
> > 
> > http://scienceagainstevolution.info/v19i1f.htm
> 
> Interesting article. I've seen many times the statement that the various dating methods agreed within 20%. The CMB studies' conclusion that the universe is 13.78 billion years old seems to give us 'old-age' creation. Your version of 'God creating' appears to me to make you an 'old-Earth' creationist. Would you describe yourself that way in your thinking? Do you doubt the CMB conclusion?-There is a reason they match like that. http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/dating.html-
"Juggling" is also performed by geochronologists in this K-Ar system. Here the actual observed branching ratio is not used, but rather a small ratio is arbitrarily chosen in an effort to match dates obtained method with U-Th-Pb dates.-I doubt a lot of science. I honestly don't know enough about CMB detection and the errors involved to make an educated argument against it though. I will say this. I have long held that our theories regarding space and the nature of creation in general were mistaken in major ways, particularly with the issues surrounding baic assumptions such as gravity. Because gravity would affect the red shift that they use to 'measure' the age of the CMB, it does bring it into question.

--
What is the purpose of living? How about, 'to reduce needless suffering. It seems to me to be a worthy purpose.