Radiometric Dating (The limitations of science)

by David Turell , Tuesday, October 21, 2014, 22:52 (3684 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained

I follow this guys news letters every month, and for an engineer, he makes some very well reasoned arguments. 
> > > 
> > > http://scienceagainstevolution.info/v19i1f.htm
> > 
> > Interesting article. I've seen many times the statement that the various dating methods agreed within 20%. The CMB studies' conclusion that the universe is 13.78 billion years old seems to give us 'old-age' creation. Your version of 'God creating' appears to me to make you an 'old-Earth' creationist. Would you describe yourself that way in your thinking? Do you doubt the CMB conclusion?
> 
> There is a reason they match like that. http://www.cs.unc.edu/~plaisted/ce/dating.html-
> Tony: I will say this. I have long held that our theories regarding space and the nature of creation in general were mistaken in major ways, particularly with the issues surrounding basic assumptions such as gravity. Because gravity would affect the red shift that they use to 'measure' the age of the CMB, it does bring it into question.-Interesting point about gravity and the CMB. Surely they took that into account. So how old do you think the universe is, close to their estimate or not? Thanks for another interesting website.