Science vs. Religion: (Chapter 4) (Humans)

by Balance_Maintained @, U.S.A., Monday, July 11, 2011, 23:40 (4883 days ago) @ xeno6696

dhw,
> 
> I uh...
> 
> Well I have nothing really to add here. If you don't accept Natural Selection as I discussed it here, I can't really say anything about the subject. The only way to dislodge NS as the lynchpin is to demonstrate (as I said earlier) that creatures evolve without need of a stimuli. That's it. That's all you need to do.--No. You are still using NS as an active force in the stimulation of transformation. A change in environment is an stimulus. A dietary change is an stimulus. A lack of available breeding mates is a stimulus. NS is the results. It does not change or influence anything in anyway.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum