Science vs. Religion: (Chapter 4) (Humans)

by xeno6696 @, Sonoran Desert, Monday, July 04, 2011, 04:44 (4890 days ago) @ xeno6696

I just started chapter four... and...-David, your definition of "Intelligent Design" is absolutely different from Dembski, Behe, et al that I really hate that you don't seem to care to be lumped in there. -MUCH confusion over the years is summed up on page 88. You describe the 3 forms of design (purposeless, ID, and supernaturally mediated.) -YOU DO NOT ARGUE LIKE BEHE or DEMBSKI!!! Sorry for shouting. ID as I have understood it is ONLY your definition 3. Considering that I learned in college that organisms actively alter their own genome, when you call yourself a proponent of ID, I feel you are lumping yourself in with the wrong crowd. Of course, I haven't felt you belonged with those guys for some time, as you are not an inflammatory speaker...-Sorry... I'll actually read the rest of the chapter now...

--
\"Why is it, Master, that ascetics fight with ascetics?\"

\"It is, brahmin, because of attachment to views, adherence to views, fixation on views, addiction to views, obsession with views, holding firmly to views that ascetics fight with ascetics.\"


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum