Quantum Physics: double slit not understood (General)

by David Turell @, Tuesday, September 11, 2018, 15:39 (2263 days ago) @ David Turell

Here is Ananthaswamy's article:

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/what-does-quantum-theory-actually-tel...

"But quantum theory is entirely unclear about what constitutes a “measurement.” It simply postulates that the measuring device must be classical, without defining where such a boundary between the classical and quantum lies, thus leaving the door open for those who think that human consciousness needs to be invoked for collapse. Last May, Henry Stapp and colleagues argued, in this forum, that the double-slit experiment and its modern variants provide evidence that “a conscious observer may be indispensable” to make sense of the quantum realm and that a transpersonal mind underlies the material world.

"But these experiments don’t constitute empirical evidence for such claims. In the double-slit experiment done with single photons, all one can do is verify the probabilistic predictions of the mathematics. If the probabilities are borne out over the course of sending tens of thousands of identical photons through the double slit, the theory claims that each photon’s wave function collapsed—thanks to an ill-defined process called measurement. That’s all.

***

"If nothing else, these experiments are showing that we cannot yet make any claims about the nature of reality, even if the claims are well-motivated mathematically or philosophically. And given that neuroscientists and philosophers of mind don’t agree on the nature of consciousness, claims that it collapses wave functions are premature at best and misleading and wrong at worst."

Comment: I've omitted the specific research discussed. He does not mention delayed choice studies which definitely imply a role for consciousness.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum