Quantum Physics: Lights Frozen in Time (General)

by dhw, Friday, August 19, 2016, 12:11 (3019 days ago) @ BBella

PART ONE-BBELLA: I just found this interesting excerpt from a book while searching the web for answers to a question I had on patterns and quantum physics.http://www.expressionsofspirit.com/quantumphysics.htm-It certainly is an intriguing article, and I hope you won't mind if I select quotes which I find particularly interesting. I am, however, splashing around in unfamiliar waters, and it may well be that some of my comments will be totally out of order. That is fine. I am in no position to teach, and make these comments with a view to learning. If I say what I don't understand, or what seems wrong to me, then we may get clarification. First, though, let me quote David:
 
DAVID: Quantum results are always affected by the experimenter's conscious choices.-For me, this alone throws into question your claim that there is such a thing as a “planned construction pattern” with an “integrated quantum plan”.-QUOTE: We may then consider every cell in the human body as a library of information.-It would be interesting to know whether the writer believes each library contains its own librarian!-QUOTE: At this level it is strikingly evident that there may be no objective physical reality at all. What the scientific community once thought was there in the sub-atomic realm and what the educated world was taught to perceive as real simply does not exist… 
Niels Bohr, who is regarded as the father of quantum physics, pointed out that a particle only becomes a particle when someone is looking at it. The new physics tells us that the observer cannot observe anything without changing what he sees.-These comments are extended to the whole of what we call “reality” (see below), and we seem once more to be entering the realm of epistemology. For me, the fact that physical reality can only be observed subjectively does not mean there is no objective physical reality. It simply means that we cannot know what that objective reality is. The nearest we can get is consensus. If you and I and a billion others agree that there is a bright object in the sky and we shall call it the sun, I personally would regard it as pretty stupid to believe that the sun does not have an objective existence, or that my looking at it is causing it to change.-QUOTE: Moreover, Princeton researchers Brenda I. Dunne and Robert G. Jahn have shown that this concept is not limited to the microworld of quantum interactions. Astonishingly, they have, through a series of well documented experiments, established that our minds, our intent, can alter the outcome of events.
The implications of these findings are far reaching and significant for the world of everyday activity and human interaction. They imply that by our conscious intent we bring into manifestation what we want to perceive-that we can and do shape our reality.-It's a pity they don't give concrete examples. Altering the outcome of events is very different from changing the objects of our perception and shaping our physical reality. It would indeed be astonishing if scientists could prove that by wanting to perceive the sun as a bar of chocolate, I could actually make it into a bar of chocolate. But perhaps I have totally misunderstood what they are saying!-QUOTE: If our bodies, at least metaphorically, are made of frozen light, they maintain the characteristics of light, which means they have frequency. Matter then may be thought of as light of a higher density. Thus, drawing on the implications of modern physics, we can conclude that human beings are made of light held in matter.

How does “metaphorically” translate into human beings and all other forms of matter actually BEING light? Why not energy held in matter? The next quote exacerbates my confusion:-QUOTE: It is important to stress that Gerber's concept of matter as frozen light may not be merely metaphoric. Gerber describes the cellular matrix of the physical body as a complex energy interference pattern, interpenetrated by the organizing bio energetic field of the etheric body. The physical body is therefore an energy field, and the field is made up of segments of vibration.-So we are light held in matter (which is a "higher density" light anyway), though this may or may not be a metaphor, our cells are a complex energy interference pattern, and our physical body is an energy field made up of segments of vibration. We know that light is a form of energy, but that does not mean all energy is a form of light, so what does this actually mean? That all matter, energy and vibrations are light, or light is energy plus vibrations? What are these “vibrations”? You must forgive my ignorance, but there are probably others out there who are just as confused as I am.