God & Particles (The nature of a \'Creator\')

by GateKeeper , Monday, June 09, 2014, 00:57 (3819 days ago) @ David Turell
edited by unknown, Monday, June 09, 2014, 01:03


> > GK:I disagree with the papers "pure light". That is not exactly true. Or at least accepted by most. I would be shocked if tyson said "pure light".
> 
> > You have to show me exactly what was working in an coherent manor "outside" of this universe to create us. The QM take, or this thing working in a QM environment would also have to be explained in a "something we know based" model. That being exactly what is working in QM model. 
> 
> Try this to help you:
> 
> 
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang#mediaviewer/File:History_of_the_Universe.svg&... 
> Note photons first-"photon" is a gauge boson. Carrier of emr. Gravity and the weak force came out first. They think, although they don't know for sure, that when the weak force dropped out of the initial "soup" inflation started. -"gravity", if in the standard model, would be a graviton. The weak force is carried by the W-Z particles. If use as the electro-week force, than The combo of these forces is on the way to unification. Very high temps. But maybe they are the same "particle" just seen differently.-I am sorry for any confusion. The way you guy are using "energy" is fine. The way I am used to useing "energy", it not a "thing". not yet anyway. It can cause "work" ... loosely. I retract nothing.-dwh is fine with your take. end it there or we have to explore what you mean in
detail.