Darwinist ignorance, confusion & epigenetics (Introduction)

by David Turell , Wednesday, November 24, 2010, 01:38 (5113 days ago) @ Balance_Maintained

Of the two, I find the second far more convincing, as it covers the various gaps I listed at the end of my post of 18 November at 13.18. Your scenario leaves unexplained the need for all the extinct species,> > 
> 
> As I have said several times in other posts, if humans were the final goal, then answer to that question is so blindingly obvious that it is most often overlooked. It was done that way because it had to be done that way in order for humanity to survive. The basic sustenance of our bodies is dependent on all other life, which is dependent upon the earth, which is dependent on the solar system and all its many planets, which is dependent on the galaxy and all its many solar systems, which is dependent on the universe and all its many galaxies. Early life was an absolute necessity for preparing an inhospitable lump of rock, lava, and water into a livable planet. There had to be soil for plants, which would have required millions upon millions of years of microbial preparation for even the most tenacious of plants to have survived. There would have had to be vast quantities of plant life to sustain the first land creatures, which were every bit as vital for preparing the earth as their microbial predecessors. And most importantly, it had to become a system that could survive without constant micromanagement of every little detail.-Excellent point. It takes millions of years to break down lava and rock using wind, weather, and lichens. Plants had to come and raise the oxygen level. More water had to arrive by comet snowballs, etc., etc., etc. Human evolution had to dovetail in with cosmologic and planetary evolution, all at once.