Darwinist ignorance, confusion & epigenetics (Introduction)

by David Turell , Monday, November 22, 2010, 15:07 (4903 days ago) @ dhw

Why assume that there is an unknown, essential reason for the dodos and the dinosaurs and the diddymen when there is a perfectly rational alternative explanation? Your imagination about God's choices doesn't want to accept the pattern that happened ... it only wants to accept the beginning and the end.
> Why is it overanalytical and critical to suggest that the UI made things up as it went along? The process still works out beautifully for humans. And there is not one single piece of the pattern that doesn't fit in, from start to finish, as you have already acknowledged in your post of 18 November at 15.17. Personally, I don't find anything in the least off-putting about the notion of God the experimental scientist, learning as he goes along, and so I wonder why you do. -Your imagined method leaves much to chance. How quickly an experimental God solves problems, we don't know. I can't accept religions' omni- everyting God. If the UI thinks and experiments as we do, time is lost. Your method uses chance exclusively, and the time is short. With directed DNA, chance is a side issue. That is the underlying reason I like my theory over yours.