Evolution v Creationism: guided evolution? dhw? (Evolution)

by Balance_Maintained , U.S.A., Saturday, March 21, 2015, 04:12 (3321 days ago) @ David Turell


> > >David Very reassuring, 'many generations' solves the problem. I don't see it.
> > 
> > Tony: Ever notice how they never say how many generations? I mean, supposedly they can count the generations going backwards using a genetic clock, so why aren't they issuing hard numbers to say, for example, "~9000 generations of nematode ago....." It is always nebulous answers.
> 
> David:It has to be nebulous. They have NO answers.-I get that, but doesn't that expose the lie? I mean, seriously. IF they measure the 'genetic clock', and IF they have their estimated age of fossils and what not, then they SHOULD be able to calculate an approximate number of generations based on the life cycle of the organism. If they come up with a number of generations, then there is the basis for testing the probability that the amount of evolution they are claiming happened actually happened. Right?

--
What is the purpose of living? How about, 'to reduce needless suffering. It seems to me to be a worthy purpose.