Ourcellves? (Identity)

by GateKeeper @, Tuesday, April 08, 2014, 16:51 (3881 days ago) @ romansh

R: Depends on how well we think chaos theory describes the universe. Does a butterfly flapping its wings in Sumatra affect a future event on the Eastern Seaboard? I think this speaks to your time component.-butterfly won't work due to friction but I get it. Yes, small changes here and there can affect the system. "patterns" out of no "patterns". To me, Chaos is probably not so chaotic. -R: I see it the other way round ... the more we understand the more outside it becomes. One of the cruelest things you can do to a person is deprive them of sensory input. Think of solitary confinemnet and taping a baby's eyes shut for some medical emergency during the important development time after birth. It is the act of getting sensory input that shapes us.-That is true too for now. Your "looking deeper " can be equated to my "looking forward". How many states changes from now. Or, what is between state changes? are/can be the same thing.
 
The more we "see" the more gaps appear. Maybe the fundamental structure isn't a wave. Maybe it is tiny specks if something. Thus the wave can travel. EMR only appears to "propagate through nothing". The cells looks and sees atoms. Atoms look and see Quarks. Qaurks look to see "outside" when in fact they see "you". Around and round we go. -One way to hide the view is to make it so complicated that the full picture cannot be seen. One way to do this, so that the interactions can be "conserved", is to link them all together. The "looker", we call "seekers" , see endlessness, when in fact it is a circle.-R: I think we are actually referring to steady state and a pseudo steady state at that.-yep, "pseudo" can be used. In the way I use the word.


Complete thread:

 RSS Feed of thread

powered by my little forum